June 12, 1987
Thank you. Thank you, very much.
Chancellor Kohl, Governing Mayor Diepgen, ladies and
gentlemen: Twenty four years ago, President John F. Kennedy visited
Berlin, and speaking to the people of this city and the world at the
city hall. Well since then two other presidents have come, each in his
turn to Berlin. And today, I, myself, make my second visit to your city.
We come to Berlin, we American Presidents, because it’s
our duty to speak in this place of freedom. But I must confess,
we’re drawn here by other things as well; by the feeling of history
in this city — more than 500 years older than our own nation; by the
beauty of the Grunewald and the Tiergarten; most of all, by your
courage and determination. Perhaps the composer, Paul Linke,
understood something about American Presidents. You see, like so
many Presidents before me, I come here today because wherever I go,
whatever I do: “Ich hab noch einen Koffer in Berlin” [I still have a
suitcase in Berlin.]
Our gathering today is being broadcast throughout
Western Europe and North America. I understand that it is being seen and
heard as well in the East. To those listening throughout Eastern
Europe, I extend my warmest greetings and the good will of the American
people. To those listening in East Berlin, a special word: Although I
cannot be with you, I address my remarks to you just as surely as to
those standing here before me. For I join you, as I join your fellow
countrymen in the West, in this firm, this unalterable belief: Es gibt
nur ein Berlin. [There is only one Berlin.]
Behind me stands a wall that encircles the free sectors
of this city, part of a vast system of barriers that divides the entire
continent of Europe. From the Baltic South, those barriers cut across
Germany in a gash of barbed wire, concrete, dog runs, and guard towers.
Farther south, there may be no visible, no obvious wall. But there
remain armed guards and checkpoints all the same — still a restriction
on the right to travel
, still an instrument to impose upon ordinary men and women the will of a totalitarian state.
Yet, it is here in Berlin where the wall emerges most
clearly; here, cutting across your city, where the news photo and the
television screen have imprinted this brutal division of a continent
upon the mind
of the world.
Standing before the Brandenburg Gate, every man is a German separated from his fellow men.
Every man is a Berliner, forced to look upon a scar.
President Von Weizsäcker has said, “The German
question is open as long as the Brandenburg Gate is closed.” Well today
— today I say: As long as this gate is closed, as long as this scar of a
wall is permitted to stand, it is not the German question alone that
remains open, but the question of freedom for all mankind.
Yet, I do not come here to lament. For I find in Berlin
a message of hope, even in the shadow of this wall, a message of
triumph.
In this season of spring in 1945, the people of Berlin
emerged from their air-raid shelters to find devastation. Thousands of
miles away, the people of the United States reached out to help. And in
1947 Secretary of State — as you’ve been told — George Marshall
announced the creation of what would become known as the Marshall Plan.
Speaking precisely 40 years ago this month, he said: “Our policy is
directed not against any country or doctrine, but against hunger,
poverty, desperation, and chaos.”
In the Reichstag a few moments ago, I saw a display
commemorating this 40th anniversary of the Marshall Plan. I was struck
by a sign — the sign on a burnt-out, gutted structure that was being
rebuilt. I understand that Berliners of my own generation can remember
seeing signs like it dotted throughout the western sectors of the city.
The sign read simply: “The Marshall Plan is helping here to strengthen
the free world.” A strong, free world in the West — that dream became
real. Japan rose from ruin to become an economic giant. Italy, France,
Belgium — virtually every nation in Western Europe saw political and
economic rebirth; the European Community was founded.
In West Germany and here in Berlin, there took place an
economic miracle, the Wirtschaftswunder. Adenauer, Erhard, Reuter, and
other leaders understood the practical importance of liberty — that
just as truth can flourish only when the journalist is given freedom of
speech, so prosperity can come about only when the farmer and
businessman enjoy economic freedom. The German leaders — the German
leaders reduced tariffs, expanded free trade, lowered taxes. From 1950
to 1960 alone, the standard of living in West Germany and Berlin
doubled.
Where four decades ago there was rubble, today in West
Berlin there is the greatest industrial output of any city in Germany:
busy office blocks, fine homes and apartments, proud avenues, and the
spreading lawns of parkland. Where a city’s culture seemed to have been
destroyed, today there are two great universities, orchestras and an
opera, countless theaters, and museums. Where there was want, today
there’s abundance — food, clothing, automobiles — the wonderful goods
of the Kudamm.¹ From devastation, from utter ruin, you Berliners
have, in freedom, rebuilt a city that once again ranks as one of the
greatest on earth. Now the Soviets may have had other plans. But my
friends, there were a few things the Soviets didn’t count on: Berliner
Herz, Berliner Humor, ja, und Berliner Schnauze. [Berliner heart,
Berliner humor, yes, and a Berliner Schnauze.²]
In the 1950s — In the 1950s Khrushchev predicted: “We will bury you.”
But in the West today, we see a free world that has
achieved a level of prosperity and well-being unprecedented in all
human history. In the Communist world, we see failure, technological
backwardness, declining standards of health, even want of the most
basic kind — too little food. Even today, the Soviet Union still cannot
feed itself. After these four decades, then, there stands before the
entire world one great and inescapable conclusion: Freedom leads to
prosperity. Freedom replaces the ancient hatreds among the nations with
comity and peace. Freedom is the victor.
And now — now the Soviets themselves may, in a limited
way, be coming to understand the importance of freedom. We hear much
from Moscow about a new policy of reform and openness. Some political
prisoners have been released. Certain foreign news broadcasts are no
longer being jammed. Some economic enterprises have been permitted to
operate with greater freedom from state control.
Are these the beginnings of profound changes in the
Soviet state? Or are they token gestures intended to raise false hopes
in the West, or to strengthen the Soviet system without changing it? We
welcome change and openness; for we believe that freedom and security
go together, that the advance of human liberty — the advance of human
liberty can only strengthen the cause of world peace.
There is one sign the Soviets can make that would be
unmistakable, that would advance dramatically the cause of freedom and
peace.
General Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace, if you
seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, if you seek
liberalization: Come here to this gate.
Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate.
Mr. Gorbachev — Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!
I understand the fear of war and the pain of division
that afflict this continent, and I pledge to you my country’s efforts
to help overcome these burdens. To be sure, we in the West must resist
Soviet expansion. So, we must maintain defenses of unassailable
strength. Yet we seek peace; so we must strive to reduce arms on both
sides.
Beginning 10 years ago, the Soviets challenged the
Western alliance with a grave new threat, hundreds of new and more
deadly SS-20 nuclear missiles capable of striking every capital in
Europe. The Western alliance responded by committing itself to a
counter-deployment (unless the Soviets agreed to negotiate a better
solution) — namely, the elimination of such weapons on both sides. For
many months, the Soviets refused to bargain in earnestness. As the
alliance, in turn, prepared to go forward with its counter-deployment,
there were difficult days, days of protests like those during my 1982
visit to this city; and the Soviets later walked away from the table.
But through it all, the alliance held firm. And I
invite those who protested then — I invite those who protest today — to
mark this fact: Because we remained strong, the Soviets came back to
the table. Because we remained strong, today we have within reach the
possibility, not merely of limiting the growth of arms, but of
eliminating, for the first time, an entire class of nuclear weapons
from the face of the earth.
As I speak, NATO ministers are meeting in Iceland to
review the progress of our proposals for eliminating these weapons. At
the talks in Geneva, we have also proposed deep cuts in strategic
offensive weapons. And the Western allies have likewise made
far-reaching proposals to reduce the danger of conventional war and to
place a total ban on chemical weapons.
While we pursue these arms reductions, I pledge to you
that we will maintain the capacity to deter Soviet aggression at any
level at which it might occur. And in cooperation with many of our
allies, the United States is pursuing the Strategic Defense Initiative —
research to base deterrence not on the threat of offensive
retaliation, but on defenses that truly defend; on systems, in short,
that will not target populations, but shield them. By these means we
seek to increase the safety of Europe and all the world. But we must
remember a crucial fact: East and West do not mistrust each other
because we are armed; we are armed because we mistrust each other. And
our differences are not about weapons but about liberty. When President Kennedy spoke at the City Hall those 24 years ago,
freedom was encircled; Berlin was under siege. And today, despite all
the pressures upon this city, Berlin stands secure in its liberty. And
freedom itself is transforming the globe.
In the Philippines, in South and Central America,
democracy has been given a rebirth. Throughout the Pacific, free
markets are working miracle after miracle of economic growth. In the
industrialized nations, a technological revolution is taking place, a
revolution marked by rapid, dramatic advances in computers and
telecommunications.
In Europe, only one nation and those it controls refuse
to join the community of freedom. Yet in this age of redoubled
economic growth, of information and innovation, the Soviet Union faces a
choice: It must make fundamental changes, or it will become obsolete.
Today, thus, represents a moment of hope. We in the
West stand ready to cooperate with the East to promote true openness,
to break down barriers that separate people, to create a safer, freer
world. And surely there is no better place than Berlin, the meeting
place of East and West, to make a start.
Free people of Berlin: Today, as in the past, the
United States stands for the strict observance and full implementation
of all parts of the Four Power Agreement of 1971.
Let us use this occasion, the 750th anniversary of this city, to usher
in a new era, to seek a still fuller, richer life for the Berlin of
the future. Together, let us maintain and develop the ties between the
Federal Republic and the Western sectors of Berlin, which is permitted
by the 1971 agreement.
And I invite Mr. Gorbachev: Let us work to bring the
Eastern and Western parts of the city closer together, so that all the
inhabitants of all Berlin can enjoy the benefits that come with life in
one of the great cities of the world.
To open Berlin still further to all Europe, East and
West, let us expand the vital air access to this city, finding ways of
making commercial air service to Berlin more convenient, more
comfortable, and more economical. We look to the day when West Berlin
can become one of the chief aviation hubs in all central Europe.
With — With our French — With our French and
British partners, the United States is prepared to help bring
international meetings to Berlin. It would be only fitting for Berlin
to serve as the site of United Nations meetings, or world conferences
on human rights and arms control, or other issues that call for
international cooperation.
There is no better way to establish hope for the future
than to enlighten young minds, and we would be honored to sponsor
summer youth exchanges, cultural events, and other programs for young
Berliners from the East. Our French and British friends, I’m certain,
will do the same. And it’s my hope that an authority can be found in
East Berlin to sponsor visits from young people of the Western sectors.
One final proposal, one close to my heart: Sport
represents a source of enjoyment and ennoblement, and you may have
noted that the Republic of Korea — South Korea — has offered to permit
certain events of the 1988 Olympics to take place in the North.
International sports competitions of all kinds could take place in both
parts of this city. And what better way to demonstrate to the world
the openness of this city than to offer in some future year to hold the
Olympic games here in Berlin, East and West.
In these four decades, as I have said, you Berliners
have built a great city. You’ve done so in spite of threats — the
Soviet attempts to impose the East-mark, the blockade. Today the city
thrives in spite of the challenges implicit in the very presence of this
wall. What keeps you here? Certainly there’s a great deal to be said
for your fortitude, for your defiant courage. But I believe there’s
something deeper, something that involves Berlin’s whole look and feel
and way of life — not mere sentiment. No one could live long in Berlin
without being completely disabused of illusions. Something, instead,
that has seen the difficulties of life in Berlin but chose to accept
them, that continues to build this good and proud city in contrast to a
surrounding totalitarian presence, that refuses to release human
energies or aspirations, something that speaks with a powerful voice of
affirmation, that says “yes” to this city, yes to the future, yes to
freedom. In a word, I would submit that what keeps you in Berlin — is
“love.”
Love both profound and abiding.
Perhaps this gets to the root of the matter, to the
most fundamental distinction of all between East and West. The
totalitarian world produces backwardness because it does such violence
to the spirit, thwarting the human impulse to create, to enjoy, to
worship. The totalitarian world finds even symbols of love and of
worship an affront.
Years ago, before the East Germans began rebuilding
their churches, they erected a secular structure: the television tower
at Alexander Platz. Virtually ever since, the authorities have been
working to correct what they view as the tower’s one major flaw:
treating the glass sphere at the top with paints and chemicals of every
kind. Yet even today when the sun strikes that sphere, that sphere
that towers over all Berlin, the light makes the sign of the cross.
There in Berlin, like the city itself, symbols of love, symbols of
worship, cannot be suppressed.
As I looked out a moment ago from the Reichstag, that
embodiment of German unity, I noticed words crudely spray-painted upon
the wall, perhaps by a young Berliner (quote):
“This wall will fall. Beliefs become reality.”
Yes, across Europe, this wall will fall, for it cannot
withstand faith; it cannot withstand truth. The wall cannot withstand
freedom.
And I would like, before I close, to say one word. I
have read, and I have been questioned since I’ve been here about
certain demonstrations against my coming. And I would like to say just
one thing, and to those who demonstrate so. I wonder if they have ever
asked themselves that if they should have the kind of government they
apparently seek, no one would ever be able to do what they’re doing
again.
Thank you and God bless you all. Thank you.
沒有留言:
張貼留言